I'm your lesson assistant. Ask me to explain any concept, drill you on the grammar, or give you extra practice for what you're studying right now.
Shared by Colombia Conversa learners and visitors. Every submission is reviewed before publication.
Loading approved comments…
You are sitting at a long table in a coworking space in Chapinero, Bogota. Eight people are debating whether remote work should become permanent in Colombia. Someone says "Creo que el teletrabajo es el futuro" and someone else responds "No estoy de acuerdo. Me parece que se pierde mucho en la comunicacion presencial." A third person cuts in with "Bueno, depende del sector, no?" The conversation is moving fast, and every speaker is using different structures to express agreement, partial agreement, and disagreement. You understand the words, but you realize something: at B2 level, it is not enough to know what you think. You need to know how to SAY what you think with the grammatical precision that makes people take your opinions seriously.
This lesson teaches you the grammar of opinion in Colombian Spanish. You will master the structures that allow you to agree, disagree, hedge, and nuance your positions with the sophistication expected at B2 level. The key grammatical shift: creo que takes the indicative, but no creo que demands the subjunctive. That single rule opens the door to every opinion structure in this lesson.
B2 Language Objectives
By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:
The most important grammar rule for expressing opinions at B2: affirmative belief triggers indicative; negated belief triggers subjunctive.
| Structure | Mood | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Creo que... | Indicative | Creo que el teletrabajo funciona bien. |
| Pienso que... | Indicative | Pienso que Colombia tiene mucho potencial. |
| Me parece que... | Indicative | Me parece que es una buena idea. |
| No creo que... | Subjunctive | No creo que el teletrabajo funcione para todos. |
| No pienso que... | Subjunctive | No pienso que Colombia tenga ese problema. |
| No me parece que... | Subjunctive | No me parece que sea tan facil. |
| Dudo que... | Subjunctive | Dudo que cambien la politica pronto. |
Why does this happen? When you affirm a belief, you present the information as something you consider real and true -- indicative territory. When you negate a belief, the information becomes uncertain, unreal, or hypothetical in your mind -- subjunctive territory. This is not just a grammar rule. It is how Spanish encodes your relationship to truth.
At B2, Colombian speakers rarely state opinions as blunt facts. They hedge -- using the conditional tense to soften their position and sound more thoughtful.
| Direct (sounds aggressive) | Hedged with conditional (sounds B2+) |
|---|---|
| Eso es una mala idea. | Yo diria que eso no es la mejor opcion. |
| Eso no funciona. | No pensaria que eso funcione en este contexto. |
| Hay que cambiar la ley. | Yo consideraria que la ley necesita ajustes. |
| Usted esta equivocado. | Yo no estaria tan seguro de eso. |
The Colombian hedge formula: Yo diria que + indicative is the single most useful hedging structure. It signals "I have an opinion, but I am open to discussion." Colombians value this kind of linguistic courtesy, especially in professional settings.
Team Meeting in Medellin
Context: Your team is discussing whether to launch a product in Cali or Barranquilla first.
Direct (too blunt): "Cali es mejor. Barranquilla no tiene el mercado."
B2 hedged version: "Bueno, desde mi punto de vista, yo diria que Cali podria ser una mejor opcion inicial, porque me parece que el mercado esta un poco mas maduro ahi. Pero tambien reconoceria que Barranquilla tiene sus ventajas."
Notice how the B2 version: (1) opens with a discourse marker, (2) uses yo diria que for the main opinion, (3) uses podria instead of es, (4) concedes the other side with pero tambien reconoceria que.
Discourse markers are the signposts that tell your listener "an opinion is coming" or "I am about to agree/disagree." At B2, you need a repertoire beyond yo creo que.
Introducing your opinion:
| Marker | Register | Example |
|---|---|---|
| En mi opinion... | Neutral | En mi opinion, el cambio es necesario. |
| Desde mi punto de vista... | Professional | Desde mi punto de vista, la propuesta tiene merito. |
| A mi modo de ver... | Formal/intellectual | A mi modo de ver, el problema es estructural. |
| Para mi... | Casual | Para mi, eso no tiene sentido. |
| Yo diria que... | Diplomatic | Yo diria que hay que pensarlo mas. |
| A mi parecer... | Written/formal | A mi parecer, la evidencia es clara. |
Expressing agreement:
| Structure | Strength | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Estoy totalmente de acuerdo. | Strong | Full agreement |
| Tiene toda la razon. | Strong | Validating the other person |
| Coincido con usted en que... | Professional | Coincido con usted en que el plazo es corto. |
| Es cierto que... | Acknowledging | Es cierto que hay desafios, pero... |
Expressing disagreement:
| Structure | Strength | Example |
|---|---|---|
| No estoy de acuerdo. | Direct | Clear but polite |
| Respeto su opinion, pero... | Diplomatic | Respeto su opinion, pero no creo que sea asi. |
| Entiendo su punto, sin embargo... | Professional | Acknowledges before disagreeing |
| No lo veo asi. | Casual but clear | Colombian way to disagree softly |
Which discourse marker is MOST appropriate for a formal business presentation?
Real B2 conversation is rarely about full agreement or full disagreement. Most Colombian discussions live in partial agreement -- acknowledging what is right in someone's argument while introducing your own perspective.
The partial agreement formula:
Es cierto que + [concession in indicative] + pero/sin embargo/no obstante + [your position]
| Full structure | Example |
|---|---|
| Es cierto que..., pero... | Es cierto que el teletrabajo ahorra tiempo, pero no creo que sea sostenible para todos los sectores. |
| Tiene razon en que..., sin embargo... | Tiene razon en que los costos son altos, sin embargo yo diria que la inversion vale la pena. |
| Estoy de acuerdo en parte... | Estoy de acuerdo en parte. Me parece que la idea es buena, pero la implementacion necesita mas trabajo. |
Notice the grammar: the concession (what you agree with) uses indicative because you accept it as true. Your counterpoint may use subjunctive if it negates a belief, or conditional if you are hedging.
University Debate in Bogota
Topic: Should Colombia invest more in renewable energy or oil?
Student A: "Colombia deberia invertir todo en energia renovable. El petroleo ya no tiene futuro."
Your B2 partial agreement: "Bueno, es cierto que las energias renovables son el futuro, y coincido en que Colombia necesita diversificar. Sin embargo, no creo que sea realista abandonar el petroleo de un dia para otro. Yo diria que se necesita una transicion gradual -- por un lado, aumentar la inversion en renovables, y por otro, mantener la produccion petrolera mientras se desarrollan alternativas."
This response uses: partial agreement (es cierto que + indicative), a negated belief (no creo que + subjunctive), hedging (yo diria que), and the two-sided marker por un lado... por otro.
Choose the right register: Desde mi punto de vista... (professional), Para mi... (casual), A mi modo de ver... (formal).
Use yo diria que + indicative for hedged claims, or creo que + indicative for direct claims. Avoid blunt statements without framing.
Use es cierto que + indicative, or entiendo que + indicative/subjunctive. This shows intellectual honesty and is highly valued in Colombian professional culture.
Which response shows the best B2-level partial disagreement?
Dinner Conversation in Cartagena
Context: Your Colombian friend's family is discussing whether young people should study abroad.
Tia Marta: "Los jovenes de hoy solo quieren irse del pais. No valoran lo que tenemos aqui."
Your B2 response: "Entiendo su punto, Dona Marta, y es cierto que Colombia tiene universidades muy buenas. Pero yo no diria que querer estudiar afuera signifique no valorar lo de aqui. Desde mi punto de vista, me parece que la experiencia internacional puede enriquecer mucho, y muchos jovenes regresan con ideas que benefician al pais. No cree usted que seria bueno tener esa perspectiva global?"
Grammar breakdown: es cierto que + indicative (concession), no diria que + subjunctive signifique (negated hedged belief), me parece que + indicative (opinion), rhetorical question with conditional seria (diplomatic close).
Daily Opinion Drills
Monday-Tuesday: Pick any news headline from El Tiempo or El Espectador. Write your opinion using three different discourse markers (one casual, one professional, one formal). Practice the indicative/subjunctive split in each.
Wednesday-Thursday: Find a controversial topic on Colombian social media. Write a partial agreement response using the es cierto que... pero no creo que... structure. Make sure the concession uses indicative and the counterpoint uses subjunctive.
Friday: Record yourself giving a 60-second opinion on any topic using the Opinion Sandwich. Listen back and check: Did you hedge? Did you acknowledge the other side? Did you close with a question or suggestion?
Weekend: Have a real conversation (or practice with a language partner) where you disagree with something using no lo veo asi or respeto su opinion, pero.... Notice how the other person reacts to your diplomatic disagreement.
Use pero, sin embargo, or no obstante + your position. If negating a belief, use subjunctive: pero no creo que sea tan simple.
Yo propondria que..., No seria mejor que...?, Valdria la pena considerar... This leaves the conversation open.